From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127965 invoked by alias); 7 Jul 2015 16:18:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 127956 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jul 2015 16:18:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:18:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8DA4F65B; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t67GI57g003886; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:18:06 -0400 Message-ID: <559BFBBD.4000303@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:18:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker , Simon Marchi CC: gdb-patches Subject: Re: Should this be on the blocker list for the 7.10 release? References: <559AE482.1010109@ericsson.com> <20150707132459.GA16734@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150707132459.GA16734@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 On 07/07/2015 02:24 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Not sure. I think Pedro would be in a better position to answer. > For now, I've put this issue as a "maybe" for 7.10; so we will not > release until this is fixed, or we explicitly decide it's OK for 7.10. > > Pedro? Let me take a look and understand this better. Thanks, Pedro Alves