Re: [PATCH 1/5] Introduce build_debug_file_name

Eli Zaretskii
2015-06-17T16:42:14Z

> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:47:34 +0100
> From: Gary Benson <gbenson@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, cedric.buissart@gmail.com
>
> For the case you mention nothing would be stripped (the "d" in that
> path is !IS_DIR_SEPARATOR) so the filename components would be
> concatenated verbatim, just as with the original code. The resulting
> filename may not make sense, but it's not a regression.

But won't we produce "d://foo/bar" as result?

> I don't believe this series should be blocked unless it breaks
> something that actually worked before.

If a fix is very simple, why not make it?