Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make file-based lookup more interruptable
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 07:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <556D6267.5080408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22TDaetTJyuTHPJboyziJAzoP88N7Gii6iOYfTmPXsNCLg@mail.gmail.com>

[Sorry for being late]

On 22/05/15 18:46, Doug Evans wrote:
> I'd classify this as being no different than a performance improvement.

I think they are different.  IMO, performance improvement is the time
or memory reduction to some degree.  This kind of change can be user
visible (10 min -> 10s) and can be user invisible (2s -> 1s).

> There already is a level of interruptability, the only change is in degree
> of responsiveness.
>
> We*can*  start adding such things to NEWS, but we don't do so today.
> Before we start imposing this on everyone, we'll need to establish
> what does and does not qualify - I'm guessing we don't want to add
> a NEWS entry for every little performance improvement.

However, this change isn't performance improvement, because it doesn't
shorten the time of operation like "b 'foo.c':bar".  This change only
makes GDB more interruptable during some operations, IMO this is a good
news to users and we should let them know.

Regarding to NEWS entry for performance improvement, I don't have an
opinion on it.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-02  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-15 22:20 Doug Evans
2015-05-19 11:55 ` Yao Qi
2015-05-22 17:46   ` Doug Evans
2015-06-02  0:03     ` Doug Evans
2015-06-02  7:59     ` Yao Qi [this message]
2015-06-02 12:34       ` Doug Evans
2015-06-02 13:08         ` Yao Qi
2015-06-02 13:20           ` Doug Evans
2015-06-02 13:46             ` Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=556D6267.5080408@gmail.com \
    --to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox