From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20959 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2001 15:45:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20899 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2001 15:45:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO balder.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.15) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2001 15:45:46 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([192.116.55.139]) by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id BBK84866; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:45:40 +0200 (IST) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:50:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Message-Id: <5567-Fri30Nov2001174510+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: emacs 21.1.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20011130161336.01698ae8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> (message from Pierre Muller on Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:17:27 +0100) Subject: Re: Bug with watchpoints on Linux Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4.2.0.58.20011121124943.00a4a288@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20011121124943.00a4a288@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20011130161336.01698ae8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00397.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:17:27 +0100 > From: Pierre Muller > > What do we do about this? > I proposed to add a call to i386_cleanup_dregs > for all targets using the standard > i386 hardware watchpoints, but > Eli seems still not convinced by my reports.... You don't need to convince me (the port I'm responsible for _does_ use i386_cleanup_dregs, after all ;-). You need to convince Mark Kettenis. I'm sure that if you post a test program and a full recipe to reproduce the problem, and then show the patch which makes the problem go away, Mark will happily accept it. Btw, please use "diff -c" or 'diff -u" when you send diffs. The format you were using is very hard to read, and also is prone to failures when applied with Patch, if the sources changed a bit since the version you used to produce the diffs. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Bug with watchpoints on Linux Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <5567-Fri30Nov2001174510+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <4.2.0.58.20011121124943.00a4a288@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20011130161336.01698ae8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00612.html Message-ID: <20011130074500.oXrI9my8T9gsKS2r3vVI6pPCwkuMKCUFPpK1tJwNTEM@z> > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 16:17:27 +0100 > From: Pierre Muller > > What do we do about this? > I proposed to add a call to i386_cleanup_dregs > for all targets using the standard > i386 hardware watchpoints, but > Eli seems still not convinced by my reports.... You don't need to convince me (the port I'm responsible for _does_ use i386_cleanup_dregs, after all ;-). You need to convince Mark Kettenis. I'm sure that if you post a test program and a full recipe to reproduce the problem, and then show the patch which makes the problem go away, Mark will happily accept it. Btw, please use "diff -c" or 'diff -u" when you send diffs. The format you were using is very hard to read, and also is prone to failures when applied with Patch, if the sources changed a bit since the version you used to produce the diffs.