Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, <binutils@sourceware.org>,
	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>,
	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] Add FreeBSD/mips architecture.
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 00:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5558a939-1a9e-1e22-6b53-a3d710dcb522@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1705214.U73jUJvlEx@ralph.baldwin.cx>

On 01/04/2017 04:10 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 04, 2017 03:23:00 PM Luis Machado wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Did this get pushed? I thought we were waiting for Maciej to provide
>> feedback?
>
> I did not push the binutils change, only the gdb ones (they are independent).
> Between Pedro's earlier comments and yours (which I had taken as approval),
> I figured the GDB ones were fine and didn't want to keep reposting them while
> hashing out the binutils change.  (I've seen some other patch series go by
> where a subset of patches were committed earlier while other patches were
> reworked.)
>

I see.

>> Also please note i only review, i don't approve. Mark Kettenis would be
>> the one to approve native FreeBSD bits (if the MAINTAINERS file is still
>> up-to-date).
>>
>> Or maybe that has changed? If so, the MAINTAINERS file needs to be updated.
>
> Hmm, I misinterpreted your comments as approval then.  Most of my recent
> FreeBSD changes have been approved by Pedro Alves.
>

I apologize if i haven't been clear. I tend to remind people about 
waiting for formal approval here and there, but not on every review.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-05  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-03 18:45 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add FreeBSD/mips targets to GDB John Baldwin
2017-01-03 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Add native target for FreeBSD/mips John Baldwin
2017-01-03 19:15   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-01-03 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] Add FreeBSD/mips architecture John Baldwin
2017-01-03 19:05   ` Luis Machado
2017-01-03 20:12     ` John Baldwin
2017-01-03 19:16   ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-01-04 21:23   ` Luis Machado
2017-01-04 22:10     ` John Baldwin
2017-01-05  0:52       ` Luis Machado [this message]
2017-01-03 18:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] Use bfd_mach_mips4000 as the default machine type for 64-bit MIPS ABIs John Baldwin
2017-01-04  2:09   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2017-01-04  3:09     ` John Baldwin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5558a939-1a9e-1e22-6b53-a3d710dcb522@codesourcery.com \
    --to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=binutils@sourceware.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jhb@freebsd.org \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox