From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129798 invoked by alias); 15 May 2015 18:42:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 129789 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2015 18:42:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 15 May 2015 18:42:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4FIghOD016797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 14:42:43 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4FIgfUH024076; Fri, 15 May 2015 14:42:42 -0400 Message-ID: <55563E21.5070006@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 18:42:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergio Durigan Junior CC: GDB Patches Subject: Re: --enable-build-with-cxx buildslave? References: <55560F98.8020709@redhat.com> <874mndg4l7.fsf@redhat.com> <55562822.7060703@redhat.com> <87h9rdelc9.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87h9rdelc9.fsf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00412.txt.bz2 On 05/15/2015 07:39 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Friday, May 15 2015, Pedro Alves wrote: > >>> Hm, we're kind of running short on resources to add new builders there, >>> but I can try to squeeze one more using the x86_64 buildslave I have >>> here. I'll give it a try today and see if the machine can handle the >>> load, and then I'll let you know. >> >> I'd be happy with making it only do the build steps, to catch build >> regressions. We can worry about enabling the testsuite after we're >> done getting rid of -fpermissive. > > OK, that is easier :-). I set the thing up. You can see the builder > here: > > > > It is not running the testsuite, so it won't generate e-mail > notifications to the gdb-testers mailing list *unless* something really > important happens, which is exactly what you asked :-). The good thing > is that we won't need to worry about racy tests for this one! > > I'll monitor it to see if it works OK for the first builds. If you see > anything wrong there, just let me know. Excellent! Thanks, Pedro Alves