From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69637 invoked by alias); 15 May 2015 17:08:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 69626 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2015 17:08:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 15 May 2015 17:08:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4FH8q3D029738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:08:52 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4FH8prL006050; Fri, 15 May 2015 13:08:51 -0400 Message-ID: <55562822.7060703@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 17:08:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergio Durigan Junior CC: GDB Patches Subject: Re: --enable-build-with-cxx buildslave? References: <55560F98.8020709@redhat.com> <874mndg4l7.fsf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <874mndg4l7.fsf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00402.txt.bz2 On 05/15/2015 05:58 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Friday, May 15 2015, Pedro Alves wrote: > >> Hi Sergio, > > Hey, > >> Would it be possible / easy to add an --enable-build-with-cxx buildslave, to >> catch C++ mode build regressions? > > Hm, we're kind of running short on resources to add new builders there, > but I can try to squeeze one more using the x86_64 buildslave I have > here. I'll give it a try today and see if the machine can handle the > load, and then I'll let you know. I'd be happy with making it only do the build steps, to catch build regressions. We can worry about enabling the testsuite after we're done getting rid of -fpermissive. Thanks, Pedro Alves