From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/7] compile: Use -Wall, not -w
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 16:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55562377.7090501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150513201648.4051.13681.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net>
On 05/13/2015 09:16 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for a reason unknown to me GDB was using -w instead of -Wall for 'compile code'.
> The problem is later patch for 'compile printf' really needs some warnings to
> be able to catch for example missing format string parameters:
> (gdb) compile printf "%d\n"
> GCC does not seem to be able to cancel -w (there is nothing like -no-w).
>
> Besides that I think even 'compile code' can benefit from -Wall.
>
> That #ifndef hack in print_one_macro() is not nice but while GCC does not warn
> for redefinitions like
> #define MACRO val
> #define MACRO val
> together with the GCC build-in macros I haven't found any other way how to
> prevent the macro-redefinition warnings (when -w is no longer in effect).
It'd be good if the commit logs were updated reflecting previous
discussions. For instance, I'd update this like:
~~~
(...)
Besides that I think even 'compile code' can benefit from -Wall.
That #ifndef change in print_one_macro() is needed otherwise we get
macro-redefinition warnings for the GCC built-in macros (as -w is no
longer in effect). For example, without the #ifndef/#endif one gets:
compile -r -- void _gdb_expr(){int i = 5;}^M
/tmp/gdbobj-xpU1yB/out4.c:4:0: warning: "__FILE__" redefined [-Wbuiltin-macro-redefined]^M
/tmp/gdbobj-xpU1yB/out4.c:5:0: warning: "__LINE__" redefined^M
...
It makes more sense to pick the inferior's version of the macros, hence
#ifndef instead of #undef.
(...)
~~~
OK.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-13 20:16 [PATCH v5 0/7] compile: compile print (&unmap) Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-13 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] compile: Distribute scope, add scope_data Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-15 16:49 ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-16 12:39 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-13 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] compile: Use -Wall, not -w Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-15 16:49 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-05-16 12:43 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-13 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] compile: Add one debug message Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-15 16:49 ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-16 12:19 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-16 13:09 ` [patch] compile: gdb_stdout -> gdb_stdlog [compile: Add one debug message] Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-19 11:47 ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-19 12:28 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-13 20:16 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] Code cleanup: Make parts of print_command_1 public Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-16 12:27 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-13 20:17 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] RFC only: compile: Use also inferior munmap Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-13 20:17 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] compile: New 'compile print' Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-15 17:04 ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-16 12:58 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-16 13:39 ` [commit#2] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-16 14:25 ` [commit] " Patrick Palka
2015-05-16 14:39 ` [obv] " Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-13 20:17 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] Code cleanup: compile: func_addr -> func_sym Jan Kratochvil
2015-05-15 16:51 ` Pedro Alves
2015-05-16 12:45 ` [commit] " Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55562377.7090501@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jan.kratochvil@redhat.com \
--cc=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox