From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66741 invoked by alias); 15 May 2015 11:37:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66721 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2015 11:37:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 15 May 2015 11:37:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4FBbB6X029586 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 15 May 2015 07:37:11 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4FBb80U011647; Fri, 15 May 2015 07:37:09 -0400 Message-ID: <5555DA64.9030101@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 11:37:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Benson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Descriptive subjects References: <20150515075915.GA14783@blade.nx> In-Reply-To: <20150515075915.GA14783@blade.nx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00381.txt.bz2 On 05/15/2015 08:59 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Hi all, > > May I ask that people send emails to this list with more descriptive > subjects than, e.g., "Fix PR/12345". The numbers don't stick in my > head even after I've seen them 20 times, so I have to look in all > these emails to determine whether I need to read them. I'm sure I'm > not alone. Agreed. > > Just a friendly reminder, my intention isn't to shame anyone! Thanks, Pedro Alves