From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97309 invoked by alias); 6 May 2015 10:21:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 97288 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2015 10:21:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 06 May 2015 10:21:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77BB2B6A52 for ; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t46ALg6J022209; Wed, 6 May 2015 06:21:43 -0400 Message-ID: <5549EB36.6090008@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 10:21:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] compile: Use -Wall, not -w References: <20150411194322.29128.52477.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20150411194403.29128.80053.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <5540FCFC.1060908@redhat.com> <20150503140546.GA18394@host1.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20150503140546.GA18394@host1.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2 On 05/03/2015 03:05 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > In the end the #ifndef+#define is not such a problem I think. OK, let's keep that route then. >> Please leave a PASS path in place. I think this would work: > > Yes, almost: >> >> gdb_test_multiple $test $test { >> -re "^$test\r\n$gdb_prompt $ $" { > -re "^$test\r\n$gdb_prompt $" { >> pass "$test" >> } Yeah, that double $ was a typo. Thanks, Pedro Alves