From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32163 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2015 18:53:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32148 invoked by uid 89); 27 Apr 2015 18:53:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 18:53:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3RIrmC7013502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:53:48 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3RIrkjb031490; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:53:47 -0400 Message-ID: <553E85BA.8020107@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] compile: set debug compile: Display GCC driver filename References: <20150423203402.23140.92757.stgit@host1.jankratochvil.net> <553E5646.8020708@redhat.com> <20150427164757.GA10548@host1.jankratochvil.net> <553E6F92.4020204@redhat.com> <20150427175213.GA12596@host1.jankratochvil.net> In-Reply-To: <20150427175213.GA12596@host1.jankratochvil.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01012.txt.bz2 On 04/27/2015 06:52 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > I do not have any thoughts about GDB, I make minimal changes. > Even these design changes are still wrong because of the incorrect principle > of search for the GCC driver. In LLDB this already works for years better, > properly designed and with compatible licensing. "wrong" is subjective. This split is a conscious design decision, that has advantages like insulating the debugger from compiler ICEs. And please don't tell me that LLDB/Clang don't crash. ;-) >> I think it should indeed be made a separate method. > > OK, I will post a new API for approval so that I do not have to rework the > 2 patch series for the 3rd times as this reviewing method is very expensive. Thanks. Maybe in these cases, we should be sending a single series with both lists CCed. Thanks, Pedro Alves