From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <patrick@parcs.ath.cx>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Explicitly call rl_resize_terminal() in TUI's SIGWINCH handler
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:07:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5538D255.7050108@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429746560-16979-1-git-send-email-patrick@parcs.ath.cx>
On 04/23/2015 12:49 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> (I am looking into syncing our copy of readline to the latest version,
> 6.3.)
>
> In readline 6.3, the semantics of SIGWINCH handling has changed.
> When a SIGWINCH signal is raised, readline's rl_sigwinch_handler() now
> does not immediately call rl_resize_terminal(). Instead it sets a flag
> that is checked by RL_CHECK_SIGNALS() at a point where readline has
> control, and calls rl_resize_terminal() if said flag is set.
>
> This change is item (c) in https://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/php/chet/readline/CHANGES
>
> c. Fixed a bug that caused readline to try and run code to modify its idea
> of the screen size in a signal handler context upon receiving a SIGWINCH.
>
> This change in behavior is important to us because TUI's
> tui_sigwinch_handler() relies on the assumption that by the time it's
> called, readline will have updated its knowledge of the terminal
> dimensions via rl_resize_terminal(). Since this assumption no longer
> holds true, TUI's SIGWINCH handling does not work correctly with
> readline 6.3.
>
> To fix this issue this patch makes TUI explicitly call
> rl_resize_terminal() in tui_async_resize_screen() at the point where
> current terminal dimensions are needed. (We could call it in
> tui_sigwinch_handler too, but since readline avoids doing it, we are
> probably safer off avoiding to call it in signal handler context as
> well.) After this change, SIGWINCH handling continues to work properly
> with both readline 6.2 and 6.3.
OK with ChangeLog entry. I wonder if this fixes PR18155?
I think we should call this and update gdb's sense of the screen
size even with the tui disabled though. I currently see, outside
the TUI:
(gdb) show height
Number of lines gdb thinks are in a page is 45.
*resize*
(gdb) show height
Number of lines gdb thinks are in a page is 45.
* switch TUI on and off *
(gdb) show height
Number of lines gdb thinks are in a page is 27.
>
> Since we no longer need it, we could now explicitly disable readline's
> SIGWINCH handler by setting rl_handle_sigwinch to zero early on in the
> program startup but I can't seem to find a good spot to place this
> assignment (the first call to rl_initialize() occurs in
> tui_initialize_readline() so the assignment should occur before then),
> and the handler is harmless anyway.
ITYM rl_catch_sigwinch:
/* If non-zero, readline will install a signal handler for SIGWINCH
that also attempts to call any calling application's SIGWINCH signal
handler. Note that the terminal is not cleaned up before the
application's signal handler is called; use rl_cleanup_after_signal()
to do that. */
extern int rl_catch_sigwinch;
Maybe in init_page_info, and probably move the init_page_info call
to gdb_init directly for clarity. (I found that with "rbreak rl_*".)
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-23 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-22 23:49 Patrick Palka
2015-04-23 11:07 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-04-23 11:51 ` Patrick Palka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5538D255.7050108@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=patrick@parcs.ath.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox