From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81354 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2015 18:25:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 81344 invoked by uid 89); 21 Apr 2015 18:25:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:25:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1E0A0638; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3LIPAiL009502; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:25:11 -0400 Message-ID: <55369605.5020201@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:25:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antoine Tremblay , Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] testsuite: Introduce $inferior_spawn_id References: <1424699660-11727-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1424699660-11727-6-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <867fv7xodw.fsf@gmail.com> <54F04A2B.5@redhat.com> <54F05E34.7070401@gmail.com> <54F06341.5080501@redhat.com> <552FE97F.4070400@ericsson.com> <552FEDFE.2000402@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <552FEDFE.2000402@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00800.txt.bz2 On 04/16/2015 06:14 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 04/16/2015 05:55 PM, Antoine Tremblay wrote: >> I have a question regarding noinferiorio and it's future usage... >> >> As the condition with noinferiorio in interrupt.exp is now : >> >> if {[target_info exists gdb,noinferiorio] && $inferior_spawn_id == >> $gdb_spawn_id} >> >> noinferiorio is effectively bypassed when we are using gdbserver, even >> as noinferirorio is true. >> >> But what if the board or simulator really can't handle io at all, and >> that setvbuf would not work.. then there is no option to disable io >> tests in that case ? > > Hmm, but why would such a board be using gdbserver-support.exp? Can you > expand a little? > >> >> Is the intention to remove noinferiorio from gdbserver-base.exp and keep >> the tests with the if {[target_info exists gdb,noinferiorio]} check ? > > The idea was make all tests that rely on inferior io make use > of $inferior_spawn_id, like interrupt.exp. My thought was that once that > is done, we can either remove noinferiorio from gdbserver-base.exp or > leave it, it wouldn't matter, as for gdbserver testing, would be > always $inferior_spawn_id != $gdb_spawn_id. But it sounds like you have > some environment that may make that troublesome. I'll need to know more > about it though. > FYI, I now finished the transition to inferior_spawn_id in the whole testsuite, and posted it as a series here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00776.html the last patch removes noinferiorio from gdbserver-base.exp. Thanks, Pedro Alves