On 04/14/2015 08:31 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On 04/13/2015 06:51 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>> I've pushed this now.
>
> I've just noticed this:
>
> -PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[0] = buffer[0]
> -PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[1] = buffer[1]
> -PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[2] = buffer[2]
> -PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[3] = buffer[3]
> +PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: get size of instruction
> +PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: get size of instruction
> +PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: get size of instruction
> +PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: get size of instruction
>
> Obviously, "get size of instruction" is the wrong test message to
> use here.  Could you restore the old messages please?

Oops, sorry. How about the attached?