From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66972 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2015 14:22:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66963 invoked by uid 89); 13 Apr 2015 14:22:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:22:57 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3DEMsxU010893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:22:54 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3DEMrXu009955; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:22:53 -0400 Message-ID: <552BD13C.1090607@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:22:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] testsuite: Don't use expect_background to reap gdbserver References: <1424699660-11727-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1424699660-11727-5-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <864mokuuep.fsf@gmail.com> <552BB206.4000803@redhat.com> <552BC3C2.6010103@gmail.com> <552BC9FC.2020201@redhat.com> <86zj6ct8hz.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86zj6ct8hz.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00459.txt.bz2 On 04/13/2015 03:20 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > Pedro Alves writes: > >>> looks we can't prevent DejaGNU invoking send_user. >> >> I think we should just call raw "expect" instead then. > > Using "expect" is OK to me, how about the patch below? > Looks good, thanks. -- Pedro Alves