From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Implement support for checking /proc/PID/coredump_filter
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55107958.1010605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bnjj8smm.fsf@redhat.com>
On 03/23/2015 06:40 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Done. Patch attached. I will wait until you look at the second patch
> (and approve it) in order to commit everything together.
Thanks. FAOD, this version is OK.
On 03/23/2015 06:40 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Jan has provided a good example of it before. When you use stat -L, you
> can see if the 'Links' count is zero (which means the real file has been
> really deleted). For example:
>
> lrw-------. 1 sergio sergio 64 Mar 23 14:34 7f2c5911b000-7f2c5911c000 -> /tmp/t2 (deleted)
> [root@bla map_files]# stat -L 7f2c5911b000-7f2c5911c000
> File: â7f2c5911b000-7f2c5911c000â
> Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 regular empty file
> Device: 23h/35d Inode: 217633770 Links: 1
>
> The 'Links' is 1 because, despite the fact that 't2' has been deleted,
> the original file 't1' still exists. However, if I remove 't1':
>
> [root@bla map_files]# stat -L 7f2c5911b000-7f2c5911c000
> File: â7f2c5911b000-7f2c5911c000â
> Size: 0 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 regular empty file
> Device: 23h/35d Inode: 217633770 Links: 0
>
> Therefore, it should be possible to use stat even in this case. But
> anyway, this was just FYI, we're not doing that.
Ah, yes, these files really work as symlinks, so ls -l was just
showing the symlink's own link count. "ls -l -L" works too.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 23:22 [PATCH v4 0/2] Improve corefile generation by using /proc/PID/coredump_filter (PR corefile/16902) Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation and testcase Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-20 19:46 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-20 21:03 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-20 22:09 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-22 20:46 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-23 20:27 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-23 21:08 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-23 23:06 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-24 6:37 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-24 10:12 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-24 23:15 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-24 23:48 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-19 23:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Implement support for checking /proc/PID/coredump_filter Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-20 19:12 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-20 20:02 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-20 22:02 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-23 18:40 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-23 20:36 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-03-24 23:57 [PATCH v4 0/2] Improve corefile generation by using /proc/PID/coredump_filter (PR corefile/16902) Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-24 23:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] Implement support for checking /proc/PID/coredump_filter Sergio Durigan Junior
2015-03-27 9:53 ` Pedro Alves
2015-03-31 23:40 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55107958.1010605@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox