From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 105865 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2015 17:59:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 105791 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2015 17:59:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com Received: from sub5.mail.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com) (208.113.200.129) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:59:30 +0000 Received: from homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7682009; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:59:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from redwood.eagercon.com (c-24-7-16-38.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.7.16.38]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: eager@eagerm.com) by homiemail-a50.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E446C1A21; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 09:59:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54F4A500.1070109@eagerm.com> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 17:59:00 -0000 From: Michael Eager User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: gdb-7.8 MIPS assert failure in findvar.c References: <54F0972E.7070800@eagerm.com> <20150302142934.GB4449@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20150302142934.GB4449@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg00042.txt.bz2 On 03/02/15 06:29, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> An assert failure on MIPS big-endian in findvar.c was fixed in >> HEAD, but not applied to gdb-7.8. >> >> The patch is here: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-08/msg00567.html >> >> Applied and tested on gdb-7.8. OK to apply to gdb-7.8-branch? > > Do you really need this in the gdb-7.8 branch? This branch isn't > exactly completely closed, but the chances of us making another > release off of it are very small. I'm doing nightly builds of several gdb branches (head, gdb-7.9, and gdb-7.8) where I rebase local patches onto the repo branches. I added this patch to our local patches then re-thought that it should be part of the repo, not treated as a local mod. > Anyway, if useful to you, go ahead and push to that branch. Thanks. Committed d99093fd0 to gdb-7.8-branch. -- Michael Eager eager@eagercon.com 1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077