Re: [PATCH] sim: Be sure of calling freeargv() after successfully call buildargv().

[Michael Eager <eager@eagerm.com>]

On 02/18/15 16:41, Chen Gang S wrote:
> On 2/18/15 08:22, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On 18 Feb 2015 07:18, Chen Gang S wrote:
>>> On 2/17/15 18:34, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> On 31 Jan 2015 07:07, Chen Gang S wrote:
>>>>> --- a/sim/ChangeLog
>>>>> +++ b/sim/ChangeLog
>>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
>>>>>   2014-01-31  Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> +	* microblaze/interp.c (sim_do_command): Call freeargv() before
>>>>> +	return.
>>>>
>>>> this should be in sim/microblaze/ChangeLog instead.  it looks like your last 4
>>>> entries in sim/ChangeLog need to get relocated.  please do so.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, really, I shall change the related comments.
>>>
>>>> while you're there, you should also fix your gentmap.c entry in
>>>> sim/common/ChangeLog -- only one space after the * is used.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, really, I shall change the related comments.
>>>
>>>> as for the actual code, lgtm.  thanks for fixing up the various error paths.
>>>
>>> That what I should do, since I focus on binutils and gdb. :-)
>>>
>>> And excuse me, I am not quite familiar with the related working flow.
>>> Can I send 1 patch to fix the 2 comments, and "git push" it after it is
>>> reviewed?.
>>
>> generally the sim tree follows the gdb/binutils procedure.  i.e. people should
>> post patches to the list and wait for approval from a relevant maintainer.  we
>> don't generally get strict with the rules as long as you have good intentions
>> and aren't breaking things (like compile failures) :).  so don't get too worried
>> and feel free to ask as people don't mind helping guide newbies.
>> -mike
>>
>
> OK, thanks. I shall send one patch for the 2 comments, next.

If all you are changing is correcting the ChangeLog as indicated,
we can relax the normal procedure.  Please just check in fixes.


-- 
Michael Eager	 eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306  650-325-8077