From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9178 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2015 11:01:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9108 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2015 11:01:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:01:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1JB1qxG018638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:01:52 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t1JB1o3q018398; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 06:01:51 -0500 Message-ID: <54E5C29D.2090902@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:01:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chen Gang S , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] sim/ChangeLog: Correct the related items' position and format. References: <54E53730.4060102@sunrus.com.cn> <20150219022223.GD544@vapier> In-Reply-To: <20150219022223.GD544@vapier> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2 On 02/19/2015 02:22 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 19 Feb 2015 09:06, Chen Gang S wrote: >> --- a/sim/ChangeLog >> +++ b/sim/ChangeLog >> >> + * ChangeLog: Move sub-modules related items to their own >> + ChangeLogs. > > heh, so meta. i'm not sure we generally do this ... does anyone else have input > here ? Yeah. ChangeLog changes don't get mentioned in ChangeLog. Thanks, Pedro Alves