From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3658 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2015 21:54:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14265 invoked by uid 89); 18 Feb 2015 21:45:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-we0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f176.google.com) (74.125.82.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:41:58 +0000 Received: by wesu56 with SMTP id u56so3733197wes.10 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:41:34 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.62.198 with SMTP id a6mr2901669wjs.90.1424295694035; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:41:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (host-2-102-217-78.as13285.net. [2.102.217.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm27253201wiy.10.2015.02.18.13.41.32 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:41:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54E50709.9020205@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 21:54:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Palka , Pedro Alves CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Support building GDB as a C++ program References: <1423524046-20605-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00499.txt.bz2 On 02/17/2015 11:19 PM, Patrick Palka wrote: > On another note, as you all may already know, C++ support in GDB is > not great. A migration to C++ will in the medium term make it harder > to debug GDB with GDB. I wonder if this is an issue worth > considering. Migration to C++ will increase the priority of improving C++ support in GDB, which is the right thing to do, IMO. -- Yao