From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29487 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2015 11:26:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29197 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2015 11:26:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:26:35 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0NBQVXi021932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:26:31 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0NBQTCN010884; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 06:26:30 -0500 Message-ID: <54C22FE5.3040302@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:34:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Metzger, Markus T" , Jan Kratochvil , Patrick Palka CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: Linux: make target_is_async_p return false when async is off References: <1389686678-9039-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1389686678-9039-7-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <20150108204943.GA4851@host2.jankratochvil.net> <54C0FCDC.1030203@redhat.com> <54C13564.8030107@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00645.txt.bz2 On 01/23/2015 07:56 AM, Metzger, Markus T wrote: >> From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com] >>> Let me see if I can come up with a fix. >> >> Here it is. I added a new test based on gdb.btrace/multi-thread-step.c >> that does not depend on btrace. My machine doesn't do btrace, so I can't >> check that one. > > It also fixes the btrace test fail. Thanks! Alright, pushed to both master and 7.9 branch. Thanks, Pedro Alves