From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13443 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2015 11:05:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13423 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2015 11:05:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:05:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0MB5BpU028848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:05:11 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0MB59jZ030309; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:05:10 -0500 Message-ID: <54C0D965.9000305@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:05:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii , Doug Evans CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Building the 7.8.90 pretest on MinGW References: <83vbk82fkg.fsf@gnu.org> <83lhkyy84l.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83lhkyy84l.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00582.txt.bz2 Sorry for the delay. On 01/19/2015 05:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Thanks. I'd like to hear from Pedro as well, as the changes which > caused this were committed by him. This is OK with me. A couple questions though: The "cup" check is there to make sure that e.g., starting GDB in a shell within emacs doesn't result in a messed up session. Did you try that? I imagine that cases like when stdin is a pipe, like e.g., when starting mingw gdb in a cygwin shell or in a cygwin ssh session, may result in a messed up screen. I mildly wonder whether pdcurses works here as is without this patch, thus whether the #ifdef check should distinguish ncurses from pdcurses somehow. IIUC, some people build with pdcurses instead of GNU ncurses. Thanks, Pedro Alves