From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2087 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2015 08:54:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2073 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2015 08:54:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0F8sjsZ029288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 03:54:45 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0F8seUE020747; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 03:54:44 -0500 Message-ID: <54B7804E.1010605@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 08:54:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Breazeal , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip two more attach tests when testing against stub-like targets References: <54B63984.2020701@redhat.com> <1421263457-21784-1-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <1421263457-21784-1-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00410.txt.bz2 On 01/14/2015 07:24 PM, Don Breazeal wrote: > On 1/14/2015 1:40 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Could you make the tests use spawn_wait_for_attach too? > > Sure, updated patch below. OK. Thanks, Pedro Alves