From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up "gdb -tui" output
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54AD4E22.1010106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Q7oD3K-dYkngEPDBbV++mLCKifTEmvJczQ=0h2FX0yXA@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/06/2015 06:37 PM, Doug Evans wrote:
> Having written all that, asking the caller to know to do
> wrefresh at the needed times could be onerous.
> One thing that occurs to me is that gdb does do things like:
>
> Reading symbols from foo ... (work work work) done.
> And if I do that on my standard monster benchmark (fortunately
> I keep a ready-to-use copy lying around for experiments like this :-))
> I see a long pause before "done." is printed.
>
> And lo and behold, if I apply your patch I see this:
>
> bash$ gdb -tui
> (gdb) file foo<ret>
>
> At this point I've hit return but I don't see anything printed.
>
> pause pause pause
>
> and then finally I see all the output:
>
> Reading symbols from foo...done.
> mumble ...
> (gdb)
Since stdout is line buffered by default (on Unix), if this is
working when the TUI is disabled, then it must be because there's
explicit gdb_flush(gdb_stdout) after "Reading symbols from foo..."
is printed, right?
Isn't the issue then that the TUI's implementation of
gdb_flush (tui/tui-file.c) should be doing whatever it
needs to flush the output? Should it be calling wrefresh
if the file is gdb_stdout? If we do that, and change tui_puts like:
- /* We could defer the following. */
- wrefresh (w);
- fflush (stdout);
+ if (c == '\n')
+ gdb_flush (gdb_stdout);
would it work?
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-06 16:12 Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-06 18:37 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-06 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-06 20:54 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 19:08 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 19:30 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 20:45 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 21:59 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-19 17:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-19 18:32 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-31 21:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-03 17:52 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-03 18:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-04 11:55 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-04 12:27 ` Pedro Alves
2015-02-04 15:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-02-04 15:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 15:18 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2015-01-07 17:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:09 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 19:16 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 22:30 ` Pedro Alves
2015-01-19 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:00 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:12 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 18:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-07 18:56 ` Doug Evans
2015-01-07 19:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54AD4E22.1010106@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox