From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30185 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2014 18:21:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30173 invoked by uid 89); 10 Dec 2014 18:21:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:21:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBAILFZ0002819 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:21:15 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sBAILDwU021592; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:21:14 -0500 Message-ID: <54888F19.4020804@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 18:21:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Arnez CC: Sergio Durigan Junior , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide useful completer for "info registers" References: <87h9xnqje8.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <87ioi1bs3x.fsf@redhat.com> <54809B2C.8070707@redhat.com> <87388no1ac.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <87388no1ac.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2 On 12/10/2014 05:35 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote: > It seems that user registers can not be listed by any means in GDB. > Most architectures only have the built-in set of user registers ($pc, > $sp, $fp, and $ps), but some define additional ones. This creates a > difficulty with the test case, which tries to determine the full list of > registers and reggroups the completer is supposed to yield. Thus I just > added such a command in v3 as well. Sounds excellent, thanks. Pedro Alves