Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New python function gdb.lookup_objfile.
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:50:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5486D3D4.5060202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yjt2sigp4kd3.fsf@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 09/12/14 02:39, Doug Evans wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This patch implements a new python function gdb.lookup_objfile.
> It provides the ability to look up an objfile given a file name
> or build id.
>
> While one could call gdb.objfiles() and then scan over that,
> it requires construction of the list, and with *lots* of objfiles
> it is a bit cumbersome.
>
> Regression tested on amd64-linux.

Thanks.


> +@findex gdb.lookup_objfile
> +@defun gdb.lookup_objfile (name @r{[}, by_build_id{]})
> +Look up @var{name}, which is a file name, in the list of objfiles
> +for the current program space (@pxref{Progspaces In Python}).
> +If the objfile is not found then a Python @code{ValueError} exception
> +is thrown.


Do wildcard or partial matches work? It would be excellent if they
did, and if so, a note in the documentation.  If not, how much work do
you think it would be to have this functionality?

A soft objection.  Not a fan of functions that return an Exception on
"item not found" personally.  I prefer to return None, and save
exceptions for errors.  But I understand that in some projects this
paradigm is used.

> +{
> +  static char *keywords[] = { "name", "by_build_id", NULL };
> +  const char *name;
> +  PyObject *by_build_id_obj = NULL;
> +  int by_build_id;
> +  struct objfile *objfile;
> +
> +  if (! PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords (args, kw, "s|O!", keywords,
> +                     &name, &PyBool_Type, &by_build_id_obj))
> +    return NULL;

If "name" is an empty string should we just immediately return an
exception here?  There are some operations later that depend on
strlen.  I had a quick look, and it seems none of the functions have a
real hard issue with zero string lookups, but it might be best to
check here first.

Cheers

Phil


  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-09 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-09  2:39 Doug Evans
2014-12-09 10:50 ` Phil Muldoon [this message]
2014-12-09 17:23   ` Doug Evans
2014-12-09 21:22   ` Doug Evans
2014-12-09 16:22 ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5486D3D4.5060202@redhat.com \
    --to=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
    --cc=dje@google.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox