From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New python function gdb.lookup_objfile.
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 10:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5486D3D4.5060202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yjt2sigp4kd3.fsf@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 09/12/14 02:39, Doug Evans wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This patch implements a new python function gdb.lookup_objfile.
> It provides the ability to look up an objfile given a file name
> or build id.
>
> While one could call gdb.objfiles() and then scan over that,
> it requires construction of the list, and with *lots* of objfiles
> it is a bit cumbersome.
>
> Regression tested on amd64-linux.
Thanks.
> +@findex gdb.lookup_objfile
> +@defun gdb.lookup_objfile (name @r{[}, by_build_id{]})
> +Look up @var{name}, which is a file name, in the list of objfiles
> +for the current program space (@pxref{Progspaces In Python}).
> +If the objfile is not found then a Python @code{ValueError} exception
> +is thrown.
Do wildcard or partial matches work? It would be excellent if they
did, and if so, a note in the documentation. If not, how much work do
you think it would be to have this functionality?
A soft objection. Not a fan of functions that return an Exception on
"item not found" personally. I prefer to return None, and save
exceptions for errors. But I understand that in some projects this
paradigm is used.
> +{
> + static char *keywords[] = { "name", "by_build_id", NULL };
> + const char *name;
> + PyObject *by_build_id_obj = NULL;
> + int by_build_id;
> + struct objfile *objfile;
> +
> + if (! PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords (args, kw, "s|O!", keywords,
> + &name, &PyBool_Type, &by_build_id_obj))
> + return NULL;
If "name" is an empty string should we just immediately return an
exception here? There are some operations later that depend on
strlen. I had a quick look, and it seems none of the functions have a
real hard issue with zero string lookups, but it might be best to
check here first.
Cheers
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-09 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-09 2:39 Doug Evans
2014-12-09 10:50 ` Phil Muldoon [this message]
2014-12-09 17:23 ` Doug Evans
2014-12-09 21:22 ` Doug Evans
2014-12-09 16:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5486D3D4.5060202@redhat.com \
--to=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox