From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24145 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2014 12:50:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24049 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2014 12:50:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:50:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA7CocSZ013917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 07:50:38 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA7Cobme015931; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 07:50:38 -0500 Message-ID: <545CC01D.9060302@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 12:50:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Colascione , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Warn users about mismatched PID namespaces References: <5451AB7E.40709@dancol.org> <54522DC7.2090100@redhat.com> <54522FE0.9050508@dancol.org> <545233C8.4070402@redhat.com> <5452345D.4040601@dancol.org> <5452391C.8020709@redhat.com> <545A020F.6080104@redhat.com> <545BE441.6020309@dancol.org> In-Reply-To: <545BE441.6020309@dancol.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On 11/06/2014 09:12 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > On 11/05/2014 10:55 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> FYI, looks like exposing the info in /proc is in the works >> as well. I just stumbled uppon this: >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/5/174 > > That's good to hear. It won't help users of current kernels though. For sure. > Anyway, my paperwork just went through. Thanks. > Is there anything I need to do now? Address the review comments I just sent. :-) Thanks, Pedro Alves