From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28673 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2014 11:27:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28659 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2014 11:27:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:27:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA7BQkXh029941 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 7 Nov 2014 06:26:47 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA7BQj4K031795; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 06:26:46 -0500 Message-ID: <545CAC75.2090103@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 11:27:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Metzger, Markus T" CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] record btrace: prepare for a new trace format References: <1405346196-1804-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <545A8D84.5020201@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 On 11/06/2014 09:02 AM, Metzger, Markus T wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 9:50 PM > > >> I read 1-11, and skimmed 12; will leave that one for when >> you actually submit it. > > Thanks for your review! I'll address your comments and > resend the patch series. > > #12 depends on the kernel interface, which is currently > under review. It will remain wip until the kernel patches > are merged but is otherwise not expected to change > (except for following the kernel interface). > > Would you be OK to apply #1 to #11 and then wait for > #12? I can't say how long it will take but it might be after > the next GDB release. I think 1-10 would be fine. Parts of it add user-visible features that are useful already, even. I think #11 should wait until libipt is actually used. > Also #12 depends on a decoder library which is available > from here: https://github.com/01org/processor-trace. Thanks, Pedro Alves