From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25256 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2014 20:50:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25246 invoked by uid 89); 5 Nov 2014 20:50:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:50:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA5KoFEW025923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:50:15 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id sA5KoDdi019790; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:50:14 -0500 Message-ID: <545A8D84.5020201@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:50:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Metzger, Markus T" CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] record btrace: prepare for a new trace format References: <1405346196-1804-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 On 10/28/2014 02:34 PM, Metzger, Markus T wrote: > Hello Pedro, Maintainers, > > Any feedback to this series? Thanks, and sorry for the delay... I read 1-11, and skimmed 12; will leave that one for when you actually submit it. This all looks reasonable, and the patches look very well written to me. Kudos. I just spotted a few minor issues which I pointed out as replies to the patches. Patches that I didn't reply to were ones I didn't fell like I had anything useful to say. Thanks, Pedro Alves