From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28956 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2014 15:21:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28947 invoked by uid 89); 7 Oct 2014 15:21:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:21:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s97FLLxH011082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:21:21 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s97FLKIm001237; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 11:21:20 -0400 Message-ID: <543404EF.4010306@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 15:21:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip server-kill.exp on remote target References: <1412082645-30629-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <1412082645-30629-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 On 09/30/2014 02:10 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > I thought about different ways to handle remote target, for example: > > - use command ps on remote target to gdbserver pid, but it doesn't work > if we have multiple gdbserver instances during testing, > - port number can be regarded as an id to differentiate different > instances, but port number is unknown to each test case. Likewise, > we can't use 'pkill' due to the same reason. > - close the gdbserver channel, but gdbserver doesn't exit on the target, gdbserver will be the parent of the tested process. So how about tweaking the test program to do: int server_pid; int main () { server_pid = getppid (); } and then simply read "server_pid" out of the inferior ? Thanks, Pedro Alves