From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12556 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2014 00:25:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12543 invoked by uid 89); 7 Oct 2014 00:25:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net Received: from elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.67) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:25:34 +0000 Received: from [68.104.16.238] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-scoter.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1XbIar-00082m-4C for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:25:33 -0400 Message-ID: <543332FD.7000208@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:25:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: eliminate deprecated_insert_raw_breakpoint. what's left. References: <201409101445.s8AEjILM007935@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <201409101445.s8AEjILM007935@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da940a7dde9c501c63aef820c0e01d2f09097350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00104.txt.bz2 On 9/10/14, 7:45 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > The process documented in the Wiki is a bit weird (adding OBSOLETE > to *every line* of those files ???) and it seems we didn't follow > it in the last major round of obsoleting code either: > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-announce/2007/msg00000.html Well, my thought was to forestall grep'ers from being misled by the presence of code that was slated to go away... it perhaps made more sense in the pre-public-repo age, when many developers hacked on copies of releases or snapshots, rather than a checkout. Stan stan@codesourcery.com