From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31017 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2014 09:50:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30997 invoked by uid 89); 1 Oct 2014 09:50:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:50:23 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ho1so883545wib.10 for ; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 02:50:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.194.89.225 with SMTP id br1mr51609868wjb.51.1412157019702; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 02:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.123.180] (82-69-37-147.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.37.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm586111wjf.13.2014.10.01.02.50.18 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 02:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <542BCE59.5060407@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 09:50:00 -0000 From: Nick Bull User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phil Muldoon , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Events when inferior is modified References: <5419C597.4000300@gmail.com> <5423EB1B.5000906@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5423EB1B.5000906@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On 25/09/14 11:14, Phil Muldoon wrote: > On 17/09/14 18:32, Nick Bull wrote: >> Hi, >> >> [Resending because the previous discussion petered out without achieving signoff. The patch is identical to before except where line numbers have changed as the mainline has moved on.] >> >> This patch was originally submitted a few months ago; at that time it >> was looked at by Phil Muldoon and others, and there were no outstanding >> comments. I've updated it to take account of mainline changes, but >> otherwise it is unchanged. >> >> "This patch adds new observers, and corresponding Python events, for >> various actions on an inferior: calling a function (by hand), >> modifying registers or modifying memory. >> >> A use case for these events is that by flagging these occurrences, it >> can be noticed that the execution of the program is potentially >> 'dirty'. (Hence why the notification doesn't carry information about >> what was modified; for my purposes it's enough to know that /a/ >> change has happened.)" >> >> Nick > > Can a global maintainer please look at this and give a sign-off? Just a > straight yes or no will do. I have already reviewed it and asked > several times for a sign-off. Nick has been very patient, and I think > at this point it is becoming somewhat annoying to pester for someone > to let Python patches through. > > Cheers, > > Phil > Thanks Phil (and Robert for support). It would be really good to get it in this time. Nick