From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2903 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2014 10:14:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2893 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2014 10:14:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:14:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8PAErK6030305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 25 Sep 2014 06:14:53 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-17.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.17]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8PAEpdL020558; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 06:14:52 -0400 Message-ID: <5423EB1B.5000906@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 10:14:00 -0000 From: Phil Muldoon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Bull , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] Events when inferior is modified References: <5419C597.4000300@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5419C597.4000300@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00727.txt.bz2 On 17/09/14 18:32, Nick Bull wrote: > Hi, > > [Resending because the previous discussion petered out without achieving signoff. The patch is identical to before except where line numbers have changed as the mainline has moved on.] > > This patch was originally submitted a few months ago; at that time it > was looked at by Phil Muldoon and others, and there were no outstanding > comments. I've updated it to take account of mainline changes, but > otherwise it is unchanged. > > "This patch adds new observers, and corresponding Python events, for > various actions on an inferior: calling a function (by hand), > modifying registers or modifying memory. > > A use case for these events is that by flagging these occurrences, it > can be noticed that the execution of the program is potentially > 'dirty'. (Hence why the notification doesn't carry information about > what was modified; for my purposes it's enough to know that /a/ > change has happened.)" > > Nick Can a global maintainer please look at this and give a sign-off? Just a straight yes or no will do. I have already reviewed it and asked several times for a sign-off. Nick has been very patient, and I think at this point it is becoming somewhat annoying to pester for someone to let Python patches through. Cheers, Phil