From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8082 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2014 13:38:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8071 invoked by uid 89); 12 Sep 2014 13:38:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:38:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8CDbR1f012846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:37:27 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s8CDbOWF031471; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:37:25 -0400 Message-ID: <5412F714.3040500@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:38:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Edjunior Barbosa Machado , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich Weigand , Sergio Durigan Junior Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PR tdep/17379] Fix internal-error when stack pointer is invalid References: <1410490007-19756-1-git-send-email-emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5412C3F0.9000703@redhat.com> <20140912130051.GA4871@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20140912130051.GA4871@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00403.txt.bz2 On 09/12/2014 02:00 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> set test "run until SIGSEGV" >> gdb_test_multiple "" $test { >> -re "Program received signal SIGSEGV.*$gdb_prompt $" { >> pass $test >> } >> } > > Taking this one step further, wouldn't a simpler gdb_test also work > in this case? Yeah, good point. We still need to use gdb_run_cmd to cover remote testing, so that'd be: gdb_test "" "Program received signal SIGSEGV.*" "run until SIGSEGV" ISTR that gdb_test doesn't allow empty command, but I may well be mistaken. And if it doesn't, maybe it should. Thanks, Pedro Alves