From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29769 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2014 16:46:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29759 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2014 16:46:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:46:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s84GjwIL030703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:45:59 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s84GjvLS011372; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:45:58 -0400 Message-ID: <54089744.2030702@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:46:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Marchi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Add dprintf and detach test (PR breakpoints/17012) References: <1408734315-21207-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <1408734315-21207-2-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <1408734315-21207-2-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-09/txt/msg00124.txt.bz2 On 08/22/2014 08:05 PM, Simon Marchi wrote: > Until the remote case is sorted out, would it be ok to disable the > test for all remote targets or KFAIL the tests? I will tackle the > blocking problems in separate patches. Sure. This is OK otherwise. Though please push the test and fix as a single commit. Thanks, Pedro Alves