From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 3j+qFMTYll9kHwAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:12 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 47F961F08D; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D7F51E552 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C44389703E; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:10:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4772F385703B; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 14:10:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 4772F385703B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [172.16.0.95] (192-222-181-218.qc.cable.ebox.net [192.222.181.218]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8CB61E552; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:07 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use sha256 for hashes in the release process To: Andreas Schwab References: <20201026013347.6250-1-andreas@rammhold.de> <2dcb2118-bd61-de63-60cb-e86abab0756e@simark.ca> <87v9expgz1.fsf@igel.home> <87r1plp10l.fsf@igel.home> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <53cd2979-e0b1-3717-35cc-91be5b2ca0c3@simark.ca> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:07 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87r1plp10l.fsf@igel.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: tl Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, andreas@rammhold.de, Binutils Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On 2020-10-26 9:31 a.m., Andreas Schwab wrote: > But SHA is an abbreviation, so I would expect ES EITCH EI. More precisely, it is an acronym. And acronyms are pronounced as a word all the time. Since it's much easier to say "shaw" than "s-h-a", I presume most people say "shaw" (that's how I've always heard it anyway). Simon