From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24083 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 15:17:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24070 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2014 15:17:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:17:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7KFHhRv003433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:17:43 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7KFHfum010102; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:17:42 -0400 Message-ID: <53F4BC15.902@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:17:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi , Doug Evans CC: gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Keep track of files copied to host and target References: <1408075184-25947-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <53EDA303.90701@codesourcery.com> <53F4452E.9070902@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <53F4452E.9070902@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00408.txt.bz2 On 08/20/2014 07:50 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > At the same time, fails in gdb.python on remote host are still there > because patch 3/3 is pending. My goal of this patch series is to fix > these fails, but I don't know how to move forward now. Isn't that patch independent of the rest? Or could be trivially be made independent? Thanks, Pedro Alves