From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16764 invoked by alias); 20 Aug 2014 15:08:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16731 invoked by uid 89); 20 Aug 2014 15:08:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:08:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7KF8BXY021907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:08:11 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s7KF89Uh032023; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:08:10 -0400 Message-ID: <53F4B9D9.4030603@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 15:08:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Benson CC: Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11 v5] Add target/target.h References: <1406888377-25795-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <1406888377-25795-6-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <21474.27284.80140.944680@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <20140807134840.GC19737@blade.nx> <53F4B55B.3020207@redhat.com> <20140820150110.GA20827@blade.nx> In-Reply-To: <20140820150110.GA20827@blade.nx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 Hi Gary, On 08/20/2014 04:01 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Pedro, to mirror your new 'target_continue_ptid (ptid_t ptid)' function > suggestion, I thought I might make a new 'target_stop_ptid (ptid_t ptid)' > that would handle the stop/wait combination and the non_stop fiddling. > That way everything will stay exactly as it is. Does that sound ok to > you? That sounds OK to me. Thanks, Pedro Alves