From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31857 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2014 10:00:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31831 invoked by uid 89); 31 Jul 2014 10:00:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:00:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6VA0ThR012797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:00:30 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6VA0SCr003346; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 06:00:28 -0400 Message-ID: <53DA13BB.7040206@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 10:19:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Benson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org CC: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/13 v2] Move errno.h to common-defs.h References: <87zjfqti57.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1406796911-31271-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1406796911-31271-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00803.txt.bz2 On 07/31/2014 09:55 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > I'll move the check. There are some Windows CE workarounds for errno > in gdbserver that I don't really want to touch, so keeping the checks > keeps the effect of this change as minimal as possible. (following up on my other email:) This path is fine with me as well. Whatever's easier, really. Thanks, Pedro Alves