From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7936 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2014 14:56:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21055 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2014 14:23:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 14:23:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6TEN3Fv028533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:23:04 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6TEN2Z5031414; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:23:03 -0400 Message-ID: <53D7AE46.8080303@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:11:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] baby step toward multi-target References: <1405711635-1102-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1405711635-1102-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00733.txt.bz2 On 07/18/2014 08:27 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > If this approach seems reasonable then it's not too hard to pull over > some of the other target conversions from the branch. Seems reasonable. We may or not end up doing things completely different wrt to the identify issue and target is pushed/not pushed, but meanwhile this lets us progress with making it possible to have different instances of a target, so it seems good forward progress. The series looked good to me. -- Thanks, Pedro Alves