From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@ericsson.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add dprintf and detach test (PR breakpoints/17012)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 17:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53C56233.8000904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404760664-17289-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com>
On 07/07/2014 08:17 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +
> +static void
> +function (void)
> +{
> + sleep (1);
'sleep' needs unistd.h, not stdlib.h.
> +}
> +
> +int
> +main (void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 30; i++)
> + {
> + function ();
> + }
Could you please make this follow the same coding standard
as GDB? That is, a single statement doesn't need braces.
> +}
> +# Only GNU/Linux is known to support (dprintf and detach).
> +if { ! [istarget "*-*-linux*"] } {
> + return 0
> +}
dprintf call-style should has no target dependencies, so please
remove this making it run on all targets/archs.
> +
> +# Are we on a target board?
> +if [is_remote target] then {
> + return 0
> +}
This should be a $use_gdb_stub check instead, and give out
an explanation for why we need to skip the test:
# The test relies on "detach/attach".
if [$use_gdb_stub] then {
return 0
}
> +
> +standard_testfile
> +set escapedbinfile [string_to_regexp ${binfile}]
Spurious double space.
> +
> +if [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare for dprintf-detach" \
> + ${testfile} ${srcfile} {debug}] {
> + return -1
> +}
> +
> +# The problem was showing up in non-stop mode, since it enables
> +# "breakpoint always-inserted", so this could also be
> +# "set breakpoint always-inserted on".
> +gdb_test_no_output "set non-stop on"
It's best to make it so then. That'll expand the coverage
of the test to more targets. All targets can do always-inserted,
but only a few can do non-stop. For extra coverage, I'd even
make the test exercise with both always-inserted on and off.
See bottom of break-unload-file.exp, for example.
> +
> +if ![runto_main] {
> + fail "Can't run to main"
> + return -1
> +}
> +
> +# Get PID of test program.
> +set inferior_pid -1
> +set test "get inferior process ID"
> +gdb_test_multiple "call getpid ()" $test {
> + -re ".* = ($decimal).*$gdb_prompt $" {
> + set inferior_pid $expect_out(1,string)
> + pass $test
> + }
> +}
> +
Add a:
if {$inferior_pid == -1} {
return
}
after gdb_test_multiple, so that if the test fails, we don't
try to use a bogus pid.
> +# Add a dprintf and detach.
> +gdb_test "dprintf function, \"hello\"" "Dprintf .*" "dprintf insertion"
> +gdb_test "detach" "Detaching from program: .*$escapedbinfile, .*" "detach program"
> +
> +gdb_exit
> +
> +# Give some time for the ex-inferior to run and hopefully not crash.
> +sleep 1
> +
> +# Check that the process still exists by attaching a new gdb to it.
> +gdb_start
> +gdb_test "attach $inferior_pid" "Attaching to process $inferior_pid.*Reading symbols from $escapedbinfile.*" "re-attach to inferior"
I think that as is, this fails with --target_board=native-extended-gdbserver,
because with that, "attach" won't know which binary the program is running.
A gdb_load/clean_restart be missing too -- I think you might get
a complain about not knowing how to attach, as auto-connecting to
native target is force-disabled with that board (to catch these issues exactly).
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-15 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-07 19:17 Simon Marchi
2014-07-07 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Only leave dprintf inserted if it is marked as persistent " Simon Marchi
2014-07-15 16:08 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-07-15 19:27 ` Pedro Alves
2014-07-16 2:02 ` Pedro Alves
2014-07-15 17:19 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53C56233.8000904@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@ericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox