From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28423 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2014 11:11:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28388 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jul 2014 11:10:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:10:58 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1X5Yj7-0000nL-Tr from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:10:53 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:10:53 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 04:10:00 -0700 Message-ID: <53BFC575.4040806@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 11:28:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves , Subject: Re: [PATCH][testsuite] Match symbol on address 0x0 References: <1405066663-1395-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <53BFAE35.3040206@redhat.com> <53BFC162.8010407@codesourcery.com> <53BFC498.7010700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53BFC498.7010700@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00260.txt.bz2 On 07/11/2014 07:03 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 07/11/2014 11:50 AM, Yao Qi wrote: >> On 07/11/2014 05:28 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >>>> Indeed that seems like an irrelevant detail for the purpose of >>>> the test. Wouldn't just doing "set print symbol off" work? >> Oh, it works indeed! How about this? > > OK. Thanks, patch is pushed in. -- Yao (齐尧)