From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Sendroiu <adrian.sendroiu@freescale.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] call observer_notify_new_objfile after the attach command
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53BD4F45.4090000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7e50a9e5f62f49c39dfaff1a57487393@BLUPR03MB136.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On 07/09/2014 02:51 PM, Adrian Sendroiu wrote:
> When debugging a remote bare-metal target which implements the gdb protocol,
> using target extended-remote + attach, gdb will not send the qSymbol packet,
> even if a file was previously specified using file or symbol-file.
>
> Normally gdb would call remote_check_symbols in several places: the solib
> inferior hook, the add_vsyscall_page hook or if the executable file changed
> in the time passed between the file and the attach commands. Since none of these
> conditions hold in the above scenario (no shared libraries are used and no
> vsyscall page is present), gdb won't send a qSymbol packet.
>
> To fix this problem this patch calls observer_notify_new_objfile after the attach
> command is completed, if such a symbol file is present.
But, if no new objfile was (re)loaded, then why call the new_objfile
observer? That's a bit backwards as it makes the core assume
what a particular observer wants to do with the event/subject. If
remote.c is interested in doing something when the attach is complete,
then we can look for such a hook. And it turns out one already
exists -- target_post_attach. So it seems like remote.c should call
remote_check_symbols from its target_post_attach method ?
That's not that different in principle from the remote_check_symbols
call in remote_start_remote.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-09 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-09 13:51 Adrian Sendroiu
2014-07-09 14:18 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-07-10 10:57 ` Adrian Sendroiu
2014-07-10 13:53 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53BD4F45.4090000@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.sendroiu@freescale.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox