From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32332 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2014 09:16:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32289 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jul 2014 09:16:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:16:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s629FwDM005228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 05:15:59 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s629Fvmg012478; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 05:15:57 -0400 Message-ID: <53B3CDCC.9050502@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:16:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Wielaard , Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Regression for attach from stdin [Re: [pushed] Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] enable target-async by default] References: <1400878753-24688-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <538739A2.2050105@redhat.com> <20140701162830.GA25877@host2.jankratochvil.net> <1404291574.3766.35.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org> In-Reply-To: <1404291574.3766.35.camel@bordewijk.wildebeest.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 On 07/02/2014 09:59 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Thanks for tracking this down Jan. Should this patch be reverted Unless it turns into a deep rat hole, I'd like to fix the issue instead. I haven't investigated this particular issue yet, but I've been busy fixing PR17072, and I ended up fixing several issues related to execution commands entered directly in the command line, before GDB's main event loop starts. This one sounds related. > or > should gcc guality.h be patched to work around the new async default > somehow? No, the async default in an internal implementation detail. It should cause no visible change of behavior, other than enabling features. -- Pedro Alves