From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix passing/returning of complex data for PowerPC 32-bit
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 05:55:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53ABB5B3.1070803@codesourcery.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1100 bytes --]
The PowerPC 32-bit unified ABI states that there are two ways of passing
and returning complex type data:
- Pointer, in a register, to a memory area.
- Data in registers.
The problem is that it is not clear how to detect which variation a
program is using. GDB currently does a bit of both. It uses the first
mechanism for passing parameters and uses both to return data, depending
on the size of the data type. It is a bit messy because GDB is not
handling complex types explicitly.
Checking the gdb.base/callfuncs.exp testcase for a PowerPC 32-bit
target, with code built with GCC, showed a few failures related to
complex types.
This patch steers GDB towards what GCC seems to generate for PowerPC
32-bit and handles complex type passing/return via general registers
(the second option). All failures are gone.
The problem here is if some other target/compiler is using the other
variation. So, for those that have a PowerPC 32-bit handy, can you
confirm it works reliably? I'm thinking AIX, Darwin or some other eabi
target.
Otherwise, does this look reasonable?
Regards,
Luis
[-- Attachment #2: ppc32_complex.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3776 bytes --]
2014-06-26 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
* ppc-sysv-tdep.c (ppc_sysv_abi_push_dummy_call): Explicitly
handle passing of complex arguments.
(do_ppc_sysv_return_value): Explicitly handle return of
complex types.
diff --git a/gdb/ppc-sysv-tdep.c b/gdb/ppc-sysv-tdep.c
index 1a880a6..2ea7796 100644
--- a/gdb/ppc-sysv-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/ppc-sysv-tdep.c
@@ -269,6 +269,57 @@ ppc_sysv_abi_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct value *function,
greg += 4;
}
}
+ else if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_COMPLEX)
+ {
+ int lgpr = 11;
+ int type_size = TYPE_LENGTH (type);
+ int ngpr = type_size / tdep->wordsize;
+
+ /* The PowerPC Unified 32-bit ABI states that complex types should
+ be handled in two different ways. Either they are passed via
+ general registers or they are returned as a pointer, in a
+ general register, to an area that contains the data.
+
+ Unfortunately there is no straightforward way to decide what
+ variation a program is using. Therefore we assume the GCC
+ mechanism of passing the complex data in general registers.
+
+ Float complex uses 2 consecutive GPR's.
+
+ Double complex uses 4 consecutive GPR's.
+
+ Long Double complex uses 4 or 8 consecutive GPR's, depending on
+ whether the long double is represented as a double or as a
+ 128-bit entity.
+
+ Scalar-based complex types are passed in the same way as their
+ floating point counterparts. */
+
+ /* Check if we should pass this parameter in registers or
+ stack. */
+ if (ngpr + greg > lgpr)
+ {
+ /* Pass parameter in the stack. */
+ argoffset = align_up (argoffset, 8);
+ if (write_pass)
+ write_memory (sp + argoffset, val, len);
+ argoffset += len;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* Pass the parameter in registers. */
+ if (write_pass)
+ {
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ngpr; i++)
+ regcache_cooked_write (regcache,
+ tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + greg + i,
+ val + i * 4);
+ }
+ greg += ngpr;
+ }
+ }
else if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_DECFLOAT && len <= 8
&& !tdep->soft_float)
{
@@ -724,6 +775,45 @@ do_ppc_sysv_return_value (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct type *func_type,
}
return RETURN_VALUE_REGISTER_CONVENTION;
}
+
+ /* The PowerPC Unified 32-bit ABI handles return of complex types in two
+ different ways. Either they are returned via general registers or they are
+ returned as a pointer, in a general register, to an area that contains the
+ data.
+
+ Unfortunately there is no straightforward way to decide what variation a
+ program is using. Therefore we assume the GCC mechanism of returning the
+ complex data in general registers.
+
+ Float complex uses 2 consecutive GPR's.
+
+ Double complex uses 4 consecutive GPR's.
+
+ Long Double complex uses 4 or 8 consecutive GPR's, depending on whether the
+ long double is represented as a double or as a 128-bit entity.
+
+ Scalar-based complex types are returned in the same way as their floating
+ point counterparts. */
+ if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_COMPLEX)
+ {
+ int i, nregs;
+ int return_reg = tdep->ppc_gp0_regnum + 3;
+
+ nregs = TYPE_LENGTH (type) / tdep->wordsize;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++)
+ {
+ if (readbuf)
+ regcache_cooked_read (regcache, return_reg + i,
+ readbuf + i * tdep->wordsize);
+ if (writebuf)
+ regcache_cooked_write (regcache, return_reg + i,
+ writebuf + i * tdep->wordsize);
+ }
+
+ return RETURN_VALUE_REGISTER_CONVENTION;
+ }
+
if (TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_FLT
&& TYPE_LENGTH (type) == 16
&& !tdep->soft_float
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-26 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-26 5:55 Luis Machado [this message]
2014-06-26 9:32 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-06-26 10:02 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-06-27 8:01 ` Luis Machado
2014-06-27 10:30 ` Mark Kettenis
2014-06-27 18:40 ` Luis Machado
2014-07-07 8:14 ` Luis Machado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53ABB5B3.1070803@codesourcery.com \
--to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox