From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15641 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2014 16:07:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15625 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jun 2014 16:07:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:07:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s55G6vh6024419 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:06:57 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s55G6rC8010638; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:06:55 -0400 Message-ID: <5390959D.3090600@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:07:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi , Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb-7.8 branching status (2014-06-04) References: <20140604171843.GX30686@adacore.com> <539080E5.9000405@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <539080E5.9000405@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00272.txt.bz2 On 06/05/2014 03:38 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 06/05/2014 01:18 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Quick update on where we are on branching the gdb-7.8 branch: > > I tested gdb head on both arm-none-eabi and arm-none-linux-gnueabi > yesterday. Except gdb.cp/koenig.exp fail, there is no regression. > However, there are some new fails (compared with 7.7.1), but none of > them are blockers, IMO. > > New FAIL: default/gdb.sum:gdb.base/hbreak-unmapped.exp: hbreak *0 > New FAIL: default/gdb.sum:gdb.base/hbreak-unmapped.exp: info break shows > hw breakpoint > > bare metal target isn't consider in this case, and I've proposed here > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00074.html TBC, this is just a test issue, not a GDB bug. I've followed up now. > > FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: finish& > FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: nexti& > FAIL: gdb.threads/sigstep-threads.exp: continue > FAIL: gdb.threads/sigstep-threads.exp: step 2 > FAIL: gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp: sizeof (*e) in test forced_stabs > FAIL: gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp: sizeof (*e) in test2 forced_stabs > FAIL: gdb.base/jit.exp: PIE: one_jit_test-1: continue to breakpoint: > break here 2 (the program exited) None of these ring a bell to me atm. > I'll take a look. Thanks. -- Pedro Alves