From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32195 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2014 08:22:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32184 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2014 08:22:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:22:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s538M3HQ005795 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Jun 2014 04:22:03 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s538M1P9031998; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 04:22:02 -0400 Message-ID: <538D85A9.5010004@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 08:22:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/7.8] user breakpoint not inserted if software-single-step at same location References: <1401394280-14999-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <5387BFF0.6010208@redhat.com> <20140530122253.GC4289@adacore.com> <53887ED5.5050603@redhat.com> <20140530132659.GD4289@adacore.com> <20140530193549.GF4289@adacore.com> <538D05CC.8050608@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <538D05CC.8050608@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00067.txt.bz2 On 06/03/2014 12:16 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Let me know what you think, and feel free to push if it > looks OK. Tested on all combinations of > native|gdbserver X hardware-|software- stepping. At least, > I think I did. If not this exact version, some other minor > variation. :-) Bah, I woke up realizing that the version I posted forgets to clone the shadow buffer! Let me fix that and repost... -- Pedro Alves