From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27263 invoked by alias); 30 May 2014 11:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27248 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2014 11:25:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:25:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4UBP2xK016274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 30 May 2014 07:25:02 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4UBP0ff014429; Fri, 30 May 2014 07:25:01 -0400 Message-ID: <53886A8C.5030103@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:25:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Blaikie CC: Andrew Pinski , gdb-patches , Eric Christopher , Doug Evans Subject: Re: [patch] explicitly specify -std=gnu89 for gdb.cp/inline-break.exp References: <5362275B.2080108@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5362275B.2080108@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00742.txt.bz2 On 05/01/2014 11:52 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > The patch is OK. Reviewing the Clang sim/inline patch, I realized this patch hasn't gone in yet, though it was marked as Accepted in patchwork. I've pushed it in now. This is the sort of case the new "Committed" state will be useful for. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves