From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Hui Zhu <hui_zhu@mentor.com>,
gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb.base/watch-vfork.exp: Watchpoint triggers after vfork (sw) (timeout) with Linux 2.6.32 and older version
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:19:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538636AF.9040208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533D17E2.9070402@mentor.com>
On 04/03/2014 09:12 AM, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Got gdb.base/watch-vfork.exp: Watchpoint triggers after vfork (sw)
> (timeout) with Linux 2.6.32 and older version.
>
> The rootcause is after the test use "set can-use-hw-watchpoints 0" let GDB
> doesn't use hardware breakpoint and set a watchpoint on "global", GDB
> continue will keep single step inside function "vfork".
> The Linux 2.6.32 and older version doesn't have commit
> 6580807da14c423f0d0a708108e6df6ebc8bc83d (get more info please goto
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?id=6580807da14c423f0d0a708108e6df6ebc8bc83d).
> When the function "vfork" do syscall, the single step flag TIF_SINGLESTEP
> will copy to child process.
> Then GDB detach it, child process and parent process will be hanged.
>
> So I make a patch that do a single step before detach. Then TIF_SINGLESTEP
> of child process in old Linux kernel will be cleared before detach.
> Child process in new Linux kernel will not be affected by this single step.
>
> The patch was tested and pass regression in new linux
> kernel (3.13.6-200.fc20.x86_64) and old Linux kernel (2.6.32-38-server).
>
> Please help me review it.
Thanks.
> 2014-04-03 Hui Zhu <hui@codesourcery.com>
>
> * linux-nat.c (linux_child_follow_fork): do a single step before
> detach.
>
> --- a/gdb/linux-nat.c
> +++ b/gdb/linux-nat.c
> @@ -442,6 +442,26 @@ holding the child stopped. Try \"set de
>
> if (linux_nat_prepare_to_resume != NULL)
> linux_nat_prepare_to_resume (child_lp);
> +
> + /* When debug a inferior in the architecture that support
> + hardware single step and the Linux kernel without commit
> + 6580807da14c423f0d0a708108e6df6ebc8bc83d, the vfork child
> + process will starts with TIF_SINGLESTEP/X86_EFLAGS_TF bits
> + if the parent process has it.
> + So let child process do a single step under GDB control
> + before detach it to remove this flags. */
From the kernel patch's looks, this doesn't sound like architecture
specific, otherwise I'd suggest clearing TF instead.
So it sounds like a good solution.
I suggested this updated comment, copy/edited a bit from yours:
/* When debugging an inferior in an architecture that supports
hardware single stepping on a kernel without commit
6580807da14c423f0d0a708108e6df6ebc8bc83d, the vfork child
process starts with the TIF_SINGLESTEP/X86_EFLAGS_TF bits
set if the parent process had them set.
To work around this, single step the child process
once before detaching to clear the flags. */
> +
> + if (!gdbarch_software_single_step_p (target_thread_architecture
> + (child_lp->ptid)))
> + {
> + int status;
> +
> + if (ptrace (PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, child_pid, 0, 0) < 0)
> + perror_with_name (_("Couldn't do single step"));
> + if (my_waitpid (child_pid, &status, 0) < 0)
> + perror_with_name (_("Couldn't wait vfork process"));
If the child gets a signal here, we should pass it on to the child.
> + }
> +
> ptrace (PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, 0, 0);
That is:
ptrace (PTRACE_DETACH, child_pid, 0, WSTOPSIG (status));
And I think we should disable all ptrace options in the child
before stepping it, in case some event is reported right
at that point, and we mishandle it. Otherwise we'd need to
make sure we didn't get an extended wait status before passing
it on. But disabling events is just safer.
>
> do_cleanups (old_chain);
>
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-28 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-03 8:12 Hui Zhu
2014-05-28 19:19 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2014-06-04 8:43 ` Hui Zhu
2014-06-04 16:11 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-05 7:48 ` Hui Zhu
2014-06-05 8:43 ` Pedro Alves
2014-06-08 11:16 ` Hui Zhu
2014-06-09 13:58 ` [pushed] Fix a bunch of fork related regressions. (was: Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb.base/watch-vfork.exp: Watchpoint triggers after vfork (sw) (timeout) with Linux 2.6.32 and older version) Pedro Alves
2014-07-03 16:24 ` [PATCH] Fix gdb.base/watch-vfork.exp: Watchpoint triggers after vfork (sw) (timeout) with Linux 2.6.32 and older version Hui Zhu
2014-07-04 17:51 ` [PATCH] Handle signals sent to a fork/vfork child before it has a chance to first run (Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb.base/watch-vfork.exp: Watchpoint triggers after vfork (sw) (timeout) with Linux 2.6.32 and older version) Pedro Alves
2014-07-05 6:08 ` Hui Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538636AF.9040208@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=hui_zhu@mentor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox