From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18917 invoked by alias); 22 May 2014 11:22:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 18902 invoked by uid 89); 22 May 2014 11:22:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:22:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4MBM68b025795 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 22 May 2014 07:22:06 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4MBM4M0023549; Thu, 22 May 2014 07:22:05 -0400 Message-ID: <537DDDDC.6040408@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:22:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ramana Radhakrishnan CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [Patch MAINTAINERS] Move self back to Write-After Approval. References: <537DBCFB.7040407@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <537DBCFB.7040407@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00534.txt.bz2 On 05/22/2014 10:01 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote: > Quite a few years ago, while changing jobs I had put myself on the paper > trail. > > Today I noticed that I had not fixed this after moving to ARM. > > I'll apply this if there are no objections. Otherwise I'd like to be > removed from the "paper trail". That's fine. Thank you. -- Pedro Alves